(UPDATED 12/26/17)

Congress has passed the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. There are many significant changes to the tax laws that are very complex in its implications and will affect all taxpayers. As the year 2017 comes to a close, there are a few tax planning ideas you could consider.

(UPDATED 12/26/17)

Congress has passed the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. There are many significant changes to the tax laws that are very complex in its implications and will affect all taxpayers. As the year 2017 comes to a close, there are a few tax planning you could consider.

1. Consider prepaying your 2018 real estate taxes before 12/31/17. Many taxpayers will loose the deduction starting next year. However, if you are in AMT in 2017 you might not receive a tax benefit even if you prepay. Please call us to discuss.

2. Consider setting up a Donor Advised (Charitable) Fund before 12/31/17. If you have limited mortgage interest deduction, setting up a Donor Advised Fund for future charitable contribution might provide you with current tax benefits.

3. If you are considering buying a new car for business use before 12/31/17, it might be  beneficial to delay the purchase. Please call us to discuss.

Please remember that everyone’s tax situation is different and we would encourage you to call us to determine whether any of these or other tax planning strategies would be right under your circumstances.

The House and Senate have each passed different versions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Both bills have a lot in common, including cuts in the corporate tax rates, elimination of a number of tax deductions and changes to the estate tax. Both bills lower the US corporate tax rates and move the United States to a “territorial” dividend exemption rather than a “worldwide” system of international taxation. The House bill replaces the current seven tax brackets with four brackets (highest bracket of 39.6%) while the Senate bill keeps the seven brackets but changes the tax rate in each bracket (highest bracket of 38.5%). Both bills (a) provide a reduced tax rate for pass through entities (partnerships and S corporations) under limited circumstances, (b) increase the individual standard deduction, (c) change the state and local tax deduction, and (d) increase the child tax credit. The House and Senate have to reconcile the two versions of the bills in a conference committee and then pass the final version of the bill in both the House and the Senate. 

As the US Congress is working on tax reform, below are some of the tax planning strategies that are worth considering. The goal is to minimize tax liability both for 2017 and 2018.

Please remember that everyone’s tax situation is different and we would encourage you to call us to determine whether any of these or other tax planning strategies would be right under your circumstances.

Retirement Plans

The maximum IRA contribution is $5,500 (plus $1,000 if you are over 50 before the end of 2017). Consider making non-deductible contributions if you are not eligible to make a contribution to a Roth IRA or a deductible IRA.

Maximize your contributions to 401(k), 403(b) or 457 plans. Participants are permitted to defer up to $18,000 in 2017 and $18,500 in 2018 (plus an additional $6,000 if eligible for catch-up contributions). Your employer may match some of your contributions.

For owners of small businesses, a Defined Contribution Retirement Plan with a 401(k) could be set up so that the key people get a large percentage of the total contribution. The maximum annual addition is $53,000 for 2017 ($59,000 if you are eligible for catch-up contributions). If a similar plan is not set up for your business, please call us to review the options.

Roth Contributions/Conversions

If you are not eligible to contribute to a Roth IRA, you should consider contributing to a nondeductible IRA and then convert the amount to a Roth IRA. However, if you have other IRA accounts, this conversion may be partially taxable. Please call us to discuss if this would apply in your tax situation.

Medicare Taxes

An additional 0.9% Medicare Hospital Insurance tax may apply to wages/self-employment income of individuals and an additional 3.8% Medicare tax on net investment income including interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, rents, capital gains, etc. for adjusted gross income in excess of specified thresholds.  This tax is not applicable to income from self-owned property rented to your trade or business.

For owners of S corporations there is a tax planning opportunity of splitting the income between wages, which are subject to Medicare tax and distributions which are not subject to this tax.

Rental Income Exclusion

Rental income from your primary or second home for less than 15 days is tax-free.

Income Deferral and Accelerate Deductions

In general, it is advantageous to defer income to a subsequent year and accelerate deductions into the current year. However, if you expect to be in a higher tax bracket in 2018, it may be beneficial to accelerate income to 2017 and delay deductions to next year.

Section 179 Depreciation and Bonus Depreciation

The Section 179 deduction of $510,000 can be used to expense new or used business assets purchased and placed in service in 2017. This deduction has some limited application for an SUV (Sports Utility Vehicle) weighing between 6,000 and 14,000 pounds and used more than 50% for business.

50% bonus depreciation for new business assets is effective for tax year 2017 but phases down to 40% in 2018.

Business Vehicles

In case of a trade-in of a business vehicle at the time of buying a new vehicle, IRS rules dictate that the “tax basis” of the old vehicle should be rolled into the cost of the new vehicle. No gain or loss is recognized at the time of purchase. However, in situations where the tax basis is in excess of the trade-in value, it may be beneficial to sell the old vehicle so as to recognize the loss.

Kiddie Tax

A dependent child’s income may be subject to tax at the parent’s marginal tax rate on the child’s unearned income in excess of $2,100.  The kiddie tax includes dependents under 18 years of age or under 24 years of age if a full time student.

If not subject to kiddie tax, consider taking advantage of the 0% capital gains tax rate by transferring appreciated property to your children. Consideration would have to be given to gift and estate tax consequences.

Health Savings Accounts (HSA)

Discuss with health insurance providers to see if they offer a high deductible policy that qualifies for an HSA. The 2017 contributions limits are $6,750 for a family policy and $3,400 for a single policy. Each spouse can contribute an additional $1,000 if they are at least age 55. Contributions to these accounts can be used as a vehicle for long term tax-free growth and the withdrawals will not be taxable if they are used to pay medical expenses. However, HSA distributions used for other purposes may be subject to additional taxes.

Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA)

Employer-sponsored Flexible Spending Accounts permit you to pay qualified medical expenses on a pretax basis thus reducing your taxable income. Please discuss with your employer to see if this option is available to you.

Family Members as Employees

Consider shifting income to a child or other family member in a lower tax bracket by employing them in your business. Employing your spouse in the business also provides an opportunity to deduct business travel costs, increase contributions to retirement plans and claim child care credit. For unincorporated businesses where the children are working in the business, payroll payments to children (under age 18) of the taxpayer may not be subject to FICA tax.  In addition to a standard deduction, a child with earned income can contribute up to $5,500 of earned income into a traditional or Roth IRA.

Household Employees

If you hire individuals for various household work you would need to determine from a tax perspective whether these individuals are considered independent contractors or employees. If you pay a household employee more than $2,000 in 2017, you could be liable to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes for that individual when you file your personal 2017 income tax returns.

Capital Gains and Losses

Review your taxable investment portfolio for potential gains and losses in 2017. Consider offsetting capital losses with capital gains in your taxable investment portfolio. Capital losses are fully deductible against capital gains and an additional $3,000 only against ordinary income. Any excess capital losses are carried forward and offset against future income.

If you are in the 10% or 15% income tax brackets, long term capital gains may be tax-free subject to certain limits.

Required Minimum Distributions (RMD)

For those who turned 70 ½ in 2017 you should consider taking this year’s distribution before December 31, 2017. Alternatively you could wait until April 1, 2018, but that would require you to take two distributions in 2018. The combined tax liability of 2017 and 2018 should be reviewed when making this decision.

Deductions

In case you have paid business expenses from your personal account, claim reimbursement from your business account. Please make sure to keep supporting documents with your business records.

Charges on a credit card in 2017 are deductible on the 2017 tax return even though the payment to the credit card company will be made in 2018.

Automobile and entertainment expenses

The Tax Court has repeatedly held that vehicle expenses will be disallowed in full unless the taxpayer satisfies strict substantiation requirements which include a contemporaneously completed daily mileage log, with notation regarding person visited and the business purpose of the visit.

Meal and entertainment expenses need to be documented by noting who the taxpayer was with, where and when the event took place and what business purpose was served.

Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) Triggers

Although expenses paid/deemed paid during the year reduce your regular income tax, they could still result in the payment of alternative minimum tax (AMT), a separate tax system. A few of the expenses that could trigger AMT are (1) large deduction for state income taxes and real estate taxes (2) large deduction for unreimbursed employee business expenses (3) interest on mortgage not used to buy, build or improve your home.

Donations

Increase your deductible charitable contributions for the year by using a credit card to make a tax-deductible donation in 2017 that you can pay in 2018.

Instead of donating cash, consider appreciated publicly traded securities held for more than one year. You would be entitled to a charitable deduction for the market value of the securities and not have to pay tax on the capital gains.

Section 529 Qualified Tuition Program

Consider funding a Section 529 Qualified Tuition Program (QTP). Contributions to the QTP are not tax deductible but distributions are tax free if they are used to pay qualified education expenses at most post-secondary educational institutions.

Mutual Funds

Invest cautiously in mutual funds in your taxable accounts at the end of the year. Many funds make distributions towards the end of the year which would be taxable to the investor, unless the investment is held in a tax-sheltered account.

Estate and Gift Tax

If gifting is part of your estate and income tax planning, utilize the 2017 annual exclusion of $14,000 by making the gift before December 31, 2017. Any tuition costs paid directly to the school for a child’s or grandchild’s tuition, and amounts paid to the provider for medical expenses, do not count towards the annual exclusion. If you are paying graduate school costs for a child by selling stocks in a taxable portfolio, gifting the stocks instead to the child may save taxes.

Establishing a Roth IRA for young children/grandchildren has many advantageous if they have earned income. If the children do not want to invest their own money, consider gifting them the amount they are eligible to contribute to the Roth IRA.

It is advisable that your estate plan be reviewed periodically. Please call us if you would like us to assist in setting up or updating your estate plan.

Foreign Income, Foreign Investments and Bank accounts

All US taxpayers are subject to tax on their worldwide income. Also foreign direct investments held by the taxpayers require additional reporting and compliance. These require two common forms: (1) FinCen Form 114 – Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), and (2) Form 8938 – Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets. The definition of foreign assets is very broad and includes ownership in foreign entities, brokerage accounts etc. Since the penalties, both civil and criminal, for not complying with these disclosure requirements are very steep, please make sure to compile the necessary information as required to comply with this requirement.

Worker Classification

IRS is continuing its ongoing reviews of worker’s classification between independent contractor and employee status. Both Federal and Massachusetts state law have a very broad definition of “employee” and you should review the current independent contractors in your business to ensure proper classification. Any independent contractor who feels that he/she was misclassified by the taxpayer could file Form 8919 with their federal income tax return to report such misclassification. This could result in a potential audit by the IRS on this issue and could prove to be expensive for your business. In certain instances the IRS has pursued criminal liability against the “employer” business owners.

The House and Senate have each passed different versions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Both bills have a lot in common, including cuts in the corporate tax rates, elimination of a number of tax deductions and changes to the estate tax. Both bills lower the US corporate tax rates and move the United States to a “territorial” dividend exemption rather than a “worldwide” system of international taxation. The House bill replaces the current seven tax brackets with four brackets (highest bracket of 39.6%) while the Senate bill keeps the seven brackets but changes the tax rate in each bracket (highest bracket of 38.5%). Both bills (a) provide a reduced tax rate for pass through entities (partnerships and S corporations) under limited circumstances, (b) increase the individual standard deduction, (c) change the state and local tax deduction, and (d) increase the child tax credit. The House and Senate have to reconcile the two versions of the bills in a conference committee and then pass the final version of the bill in both the House and the Senate.

The IRS has released long-awaited guidance on new Code Sec. 199A, commonly known as the "pass-through deduction" or the "qualified business income deduction." Taxpayers can rely on the proposed regulations and a proposed revenue procedure until they are issued as final.

The IRS has released long-awaited guidance on new Code Sec. 199A, commonly known as the "pass-through deduction" or the "qualified business income deduction." Taxpayers can rely on the proposed regulations and a proposed revenue procedure until they are issued as final.

Code Sec. 199A allows business owners to deduct up to 20 percent of their qualified business income (QBI) from sole proprietorships, partnerships, trusts, and S corporations. The deduction is one of the most high-profile pieces of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ( P.L. 115-97).

In addition to providing general definitions and computational rules, the new guidance helps clarify several concepts that were of special interest to many taxpayers.

Trade or Business

The proposed regulations incorporate the Code Sec. 162 rules for determining what constitutes a trade or business. A taxpayer may have more than one trade or business, but a single trade or business generally cannot be conducted through more than one entity.

Taxpayers cannot use the grouping rules of the passive activity provisions of Code Sec. 469 to group multiple activities into a single business. However, a taxpayer may aggregate trades or businesses if:

• each trade or business is itself a trade or business;
• the same person or group owns a majority interest in each business to be aggregated;
• none of the aggregated trades or businesses can be a specified service trade or business; and
• the trades or businesses meet at least two of three factors which demonstrate that they are in fact part of a larger, integrated trade or business.

Specified Service Business

Income from a specified service business generally cannot be qualified business income, although this exclusion is phased in for lower-income taxpayers.

A new de minimis exception allows some business to escape being designated as a specified service trade or business (SSTB). A business qualifies for this de minimis exception if:

• gross receipts do not exceed $25 million, and less than 10 percent is attributable to services; or
• gross receipts exceed $25 million, and less than five percent is attributable to services.

The regulations largely adopt existing rules for what activities constitute a service. However, a business receives income because of an employee/owner’s reputation or skill only when the business is engaged in:

• endorsing products or services;
• licensing the use of an individual’s image, name, trademark, etc.; or
• receiving appearance fees.

In addition, the regulations try to limit attempts to spin-off parts of a service business into independent qualified businesses. Thus, a business that provides 80 percent or more of its property or services to a related service business is part of that service business. Similarly, the portion of property or services that a business provides to a related service business is treated as a service business. Businesses are related if they have at least 50-percent common ownership.

Wages/Capital Limit

A higher-income taxpayer’s qualified business income may be reduced by the wages/capital limit. This limit is based on the taxpayer’s share of the business’s:

• W-2 wages that are allocable to QBI; and
• unadjusted basis in qualified property immediately after acquisition.

The proposed regulations and Notice 2018-64, I.R.B. 2018-34, provide detailed rules for determining the business’s W-2 wages. These rules generally follow the rules that applied to the Code Sec. 199 domestic production activities deduction.

The proposed regulations also address unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA). The regulations largely adopt the existing capitalization rules for determining unadjusted basis. However, "immediately after acquisition" is the date the business places the property in service. Thus, UBIA is generally the cost of the property as of the date the business places it in service.

Other Rules

The proposed regulations also address several other issues, including:

• definitions;
• basic computations;
• loss carryovers;
• Puerto Rico businesses;
• coordination with other Code Sections;
• penalties;
• special basis rules;
• previously suspended losses and net operating losses;
• other exclusions from qualified business income;
• allocations of items that are not attributable to a single trade or business;
• anti-abuse rules;
• application to trusts and estates; and
• special rules for the related deduction for agricultural cooperatives.

Effective Dates

Taxpayers may generally rely on the proposed regulations and Notice 2018-64 until they are issued as final. The regulations and proposed revenue procedure will be effective for tax years ending after they are published as final. However:

• several proposed anti-abuse rules are proposed to apply to tax years ending after December 22, 2017;
• anti-abuse rules that apply specifically to the use of trusts are proposed to apply to tax years ending after August 9, 2018; and
• if a qualified business’s tax year begins before January 1, 2018, and ends after December 31, 2017, the taxpayer’s items are treated as having been incurred in the taxpayer’s tax year during which business’s tax year ends.

Comments Requested

The IRS requests comments on all aspects of the proposed regulations. Comments may be mailed or hand-delivered to the IRS, or submitted electronically at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-107892-18). Comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by September 24, 2018.

The IRS also requests comments on the proposed revenue procedure for calculating W-2 wages, especially with respect to amounts paid for services in Puerto Rico. Comments may be mailed or hand-delivered to the IRS, or submitted electronically to Notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov, with “ Notice 2018-64” in the subject line. These comments must also be received by September 24, 2018.

The IRS’s proposed pass-through deduction regulations are generating mixed reactions on Capitol Hill. The 184-page proposed regulations, REG-107892-18, aim to clarify certain complexities of the new, yet temporary, Code Sec. 199A deduction of up to 20 percent of income for pass-through entities. The new deduction was enacted through 2025 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), ( P.L. 115-97). The pass-through deduction has remained one of the most controversial provisions of last year’s tax reform.

The IRS’s proposed pass-through deduction regulations are generating mixed reactions on Capitol Hill. The 184-page proposed regulations, REG-107892-18, aim to clarify certain complexities of the new, yet temporary, Code Sec. 199A deduction of up to 20 percent of income for pass-through entities. The new deduction was enacted through 2025 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), ( P.L. 115-97). The pass-through deduction has remained one of the most controversial provisions of last year’s tax reform.

A legislative package that would make permanent the pass-through deduction, as well as other individual tax cuts, is expected to move though the House this fall. However, the House’s legislative efforts are not expected, at this time, to pass muster in the more narrowly GOP-controlled Senate.

Criticism

Several Democratic lawmakers and tax policy experts have already started to weigh in on the proposed regulations, which were released on August 8 while Congress remained in its annual August recess. Democrats have criticized the new deduction for primarily benefiting the wealthy. Meanwhile, several tax policy experts have taken to Twitter to note that the deduction is overly complex and administratively burdensome.

Senate Finance Committee (SFC) ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., has reportedly said that the proposed regulations "confirm that the fortunate few win," under the new tax law. "Tax planners are already scouring through the nearly 200 pages of regulations in search of new ways to keep wealthy clients from paying their fair share."

Compliance Burdens

The pass-through deduction could add 25 million hours to taxpayers’ annual reporting burden, according to the proposed regulations. Additionally, the IRS has estimated that gross reporting annualized costs to taxpayers will total approximately $1.3 billion over 10 years.

Furthermore, the IRS has estimated that the compliance burden will vary between taxpayers, averaging between 30 minutes and 20 hours. The administrative burden on smaller pass-through entities is anticipated to be on the lower end of the estimate, according to the IRS.

Comment. Ryan Kelly, partner at Alston & Bird LLP, told Wolters Kluwer on August 13 that the IRS’s 25 million-hour estimate, whether accurate or not, suggests that there will be a significant increase in administrative compliance costs. "There is a real cost to tax compliance in lost time and productivity for taxpayers," Kelly said. However, Kelly predicted that taxpayers’ Code Sec. 199A compliance burden will eventually decrease. "Time will reveal the extent of taxpayers’ administrative burden to comply; however, it is likely that as time goes on the taxpayers’ compliance burden will fall as taxpayers, tax practitioners, and the Service all become more familiar with section 199A and how it is intended to operate."
Meanwhile, the chairs of the House and Senate tax writing committees have both praised Treasury and the IRS for quickly releasing the much anticipated regulations. Additionally, several tax policy experts have also praised the proposed regulations for alleviating confusion, as well as taxpayer anxiety, about ambiguous provisions of the law.

"This first-ever 20 percent deduction for small businesses allows our local job creators to keep more of their money so they can hire, invest, and grow in their communities," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, R-Tex., said in a statement. "These proposed regulations are intended to provide certainty and flexibility for Main Street businesses in this historic new small business deduction."

Improvements to the proposed regulations are expected in the coming months as stakeholders submit comments. A public hearing at IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C., has been scheduled for October 16. "Evolution of tax regulations is generally never a pretty process, but it is a necessary process that in this case will hopefully happen sooner rather than later," Kelly told Wolters Kluwer.

The House’s top tax writer has unveiled Republicans’ "Tax Reform 2.0" framework. The framework outlines three key focus areas:.

The House’s top tax writer has unveiled Republicans’ "Tax Reform 2.0" framework. The framework outlines three key focus areas:

• making permanent the individual and small business tax cuts enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97);
• promoting family savings by streamlining retirement savings accounts and creating a new Universal Savings Account; and
• spurring business innovation by allowing new businesses to write off more initial start-up costs.

Tax Reform 2.0

The GOP’s tax reform "phase two" framework—otherwise known as "Tax Cuts 2.0"—was released by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, R-Tex. on July 24. The outline is expected to be used for GOP "listening sessions" to be held among lawmakers.

Brady has said that making permanent the TCJA’s individual and small business tax cuts, enacted last December temporarily through 2025, will be the "centerpiece" of the next tax reform package. Further, Brady told reporters on July 24 that he anticipates Tax Reform 2.0 to move forward as three separate tax bills. A House vote on the package is expected sometime in September.

Preliminary Analysis

Republicans’ Tax Reform 2.0 framework is a "good start," according to a July 24 report released by the independent, yet widely-considered conservative-leaning, think tank Tax Foundation. The report praised the framework’s proposal to streamline retirement savings accounts and make permanent the TCJA’s individual tax cuts. Additionally, the Tax Foundation estimates that making permanent the individual tax cuts set to expire in 2026 would grow the U.S. economy by 2.2 percent while reducing federal revenue by $165 billion annually on a static basis.

Democrats Disagree

However, several Democratic lawmakers began issuing statements criticizing the Tax Reform 2.0 framework shortly after its release. Democrats have remained united in their disapproval of the TCJA, criticizing last year’s tax code overhaul for primarily benefiting the wealthy and corporations.

"Republicans’ first tax bill exposed the party’s real priorities: big corporations and people at the top," House Ways and Means Committee ranking member Richard Neal, D-Mass., said in a July 24 statement. "This new framework is more of the same – it rewards the well-off and well-connected, fails to reinstate the state and local tax deduction, and leaves the middle class behind."

Corporate Tax Cuts

The Tax Reform 2.0 framework did not include a proposal to further reduce the corporate tax rate. President Trump has called for lowering the corporate tax rate to 20 percent. The corporate tax rate was lowered from 35 to 21 percent last December under the TCJA. Brady previously told reporters that House Republicans and the White House are continuing discussions on the idea.

Tax Reform 3.0, 4.0

"Tax Reform 2.0 is a new commitment to improve the tax code each and every year for American families and local businesses," the framework says. Congress will examine the tax code each year to identify areas of needed improvement, according to the outline. Additionally, Brady has said he hopes to see a Tax Reform 3.0, 4.0, and so on.

Senate

At this time, the Tax Reform 2.0 package is not expected to clear the Senate in its entirety. It is thought on Capitol Hill that Democrats may support measures that focus on retirement and education savings and business innovation. However, several lawmakers view it as unlikely that Democrats would support a bill that makes permanent the individual tax cuts under the TCJA.

Brady has reportedly said that extending TCJA’s individual provisions would increase the deficit by $600 billion over 10 years but would be offset, at least in part, by beneficial economic factors. Several Senate Democrats and Republicans have said they would not vote for extending or creating tax cuts that increase the federal deficit.

The IRS faces numerous challenges, most of which are attributable to funding cuts, the National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson told a Senate panel on July 26. "The IRS needs adequate funding to do its job effectively," Olson told lawmakers.

The IRS faces numerous challenges, most of which are attributable to funding cuts, the National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson told a Senate panel on July 26. "The IRS needs adequate funding to do its job effectively," Olson told lawmakers.

IRS Funding

Olson, while testifying at a Senate Finance Committee (SFC) Taxation and IRS Oversight Subcommittee hearing, placed blame on both congressional appropriations and IRS management for the Service’s challenges. "While some of the IRS’s struggles can be addressed by better management, much of the IRS’s challenges are attributable to funding cuts," Olson said.

The IRS has simultaneously seen an increased workload and budget reduction of 20 percent when accounting for inflation between fiscal years 2010 and 2018, according to Olson. "Because of these reductions, the IRS does not have enough employees to answer the phones, to conduct outreach and education, or to provide basic taxpayer service," she added.

Further, Olson noted that the IRS answered only 29 percent of telephone calls received on the Accounts Management lines during this year’s filing season. Additionally, IRS compliance and enforcement efforts have also struggled, Olson said, adding that the audit rate is at its lowest level in "memory."

Likewise, Phyllis Jo Kubey, testifying on behalf of the National Association of Enrolled Agents, IRS Advisory Council, remarked on decreased IRS funding. "The agency is handicapped by budgeting that is not only insufficient to meet its large and growing portfolio, but also inefficiently structured," Kubey told lawmakers.

IRS Reform

The SFC subcommittee hearing came just days after the 20-year anniversary of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. The House and Senate are currently working toward approving bipartisan legislation that would significantly reform the IRS for the first time in 20 years.

SFC Taxation and IRS Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., unveiled on July 26 the bipartisan Protecting Taxpayers Bill. The measure aims to reform a number of IRS functions and administrative practices, according to a joint press release issued the same day.

"It has been 20 years since the last significant IRS reform, and it is time to update the agency once again," Portman said in the press release. Similarly, Cardin praised the bill for including needed updates to modernize the IRS. "Americans of all income levels deserve a responsive, effective IRS, and the updates contained in this bipartisan bill will help keep the IRS on that path," Cardin said.

Additionally, SFC Chairman Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, and ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., recently introduced the bipartisan Taxpayer First Bill ( Sen. 3246). The measure would also reform certain administrative practices at the IRS.

To that end, the House approved its bipartisan IRS reform package, the Taxpayer First Bill ( HR 5444) last April. The House package contains several proposals, which would, among other things:

• establish a single point of contact for tax-related identity theft victims;
• expand the use of Low-Income Taxpayer Clinics (LITCs); and
• require electronic filing for certain tax-exempt organizations

Path Forward

Hatch previously told Wolters Kluwer that the House’s IRS reform proposals are a "welcomed step forward." Additionally, Hatch told Wolters Kluwer that he will work with his "colleagues in Congress to find a path forward that reflects both the House and Senate views."

Senate Finance Committee (SFC) Republicans are clarifying congressional intent of certain tax reform provisions. In an August 16 letter, GOP Senate tax writers called on Treasury and the IRS to issue tax reform guidance consistent with the clarifications.

Senate Finance Committee (SFC) Republicans are clarifying congressional intent of certain tax reform provisions. In an August 16 letter, GOP Senate tax writers called on Treasury and the IRS to issue tax reform guidance consistent with the clarifications.

The letter, addressed to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Acting IRS Commissioner David Kautter, identifies three sections of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) needing clarification:

• Section 13204 – qualified improvement property expensing;
• Section 13302 – net operating losses (NOLs) deduction; and
• Section 13307 – sexual misconduct settlement deduction.

Real Property Depreciation

Congressional intent for Section 13204 under the TCJA was to provide a 15-year modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) recovery period for qualified improvement property, the lawmakers wrote. Additionally, the letter states that the new law should also provide a 20-year alternative deprecation system (ADS) recovery period for qualified improvement property.

NOLs

The TCJA contains a typographical error in Section 13302. The law should state that the NOL carryforward and carryback modifications are effective for NOLs arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the lawmakers noted. Currently, the legislative text states the effective date is for tax years ending after December 31, 2017.

Attorney’s Fees

Generally, section 13307 of the TCJA denies a deduction for attorney’s fees related to a settlement or payment stemming from a sexual harassment/abuse nondisclosure agreement (NDA). Congressional intent was that attorney’s fees would not be subject to the rule prohibiting the deduction, the letter states.

Technical Corrections

SFC Republicans intend to introduce a technical corrections bill addressing other needed clarifications of the TCJA, the letter notes. The intended technical corrections bill is not expected to be a part of Republican "Tax Reform 2.0" efforts.

"While this letter focuses on these three important provisions, we are continuing a thorough review…to identify other instances in which the language as enacted may require regulatory guidance or technical corrections to reflect the intent of the Congress. After this review, we intend to introduce technical corrections legislation to address any items identified in the on-going review."

Taxpayers and practitioners need clarity on certain S corporation issues by next tax filing season, the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has said. In an August 13 letter sent to Treasury and the IRS, the AICPA requested immediate guidance on certain S corporation provisions under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) (P.L. 115-97).

Taxpayers and practitioners need clarity on certain S corporation issues by next tax filing season, the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has said. In an August 13 letter sent to Treasury and the IRS, the AICPA requested immediate guidance on certain S corporation provisions under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) (P.L. 115-97).

S Corporations

S corporations elect to pass corporate income, losses, deductions, and credits through to shareholders for federal tax purposes. Thus, S corporations are considered a pass-through entity. This election allows S corporations to avoid double taxation on the corporate income, according to the IRS.

"Taxpayers and practitioners need clarity on S corporation issues in order to comply with their 2018 tax obligations and to make informed decisions regarding cash-flow, entity structure, and tax planning issues," Annette Nellen wrote in the letter on behalf of the AICPA. Generally, the letter noted the following three areas for which guidance is needed:

• application of the new laws on loss carryforwards;
• clarification of certain provisions relating to the post-termination transition period (PTTP) and the eligible terminated S corporation period (ETSC Period); and
• treatment of deferred foreign income upon transition to participation exemption system of taxation for S corporation trust shareholders.

Earlier this year, the AICPA also called for guidance on the Code Sec. 199A new pass-through deduction.

Everybody knows that tax deductions aren't allowed without proof in the form of documentation. What records are needed to "prove it" to the IRS vary depending upon the type of deduction that you may want to claim. Some documentation cannot be collected "after the fact," whether it takes place a few months after an expense is incurred or later, when you are audited by the IRS. This article reviews some of those deductions for which the IRS requires you to generate certain records either contemporaneously as the expense is being incurred, or at least no later than when you file your return. We also highlight several deductions for which contemporaneous documentation, although not strictly required, is extremely helpful in making your case before the IRS on an audit.

Everybody knows that tax deductions aren’t allowed without proof in the form of documentation.  What records are needed to “prove it” to the IRS vary depending upon the type of deduction that you may want to claim.  Some documentation cannot be collected “after the fact,” whether it takes place a few months after an expense is incurred or later, when you are audited by the IRS.  This article reviews some of those deductions for which the IRS requires you to generate certain records either contemporaneously as the expense is being incurred, or at least no later than when you file your return.  We also highlight several deductions for which contemporaneous documentation, although not strictly required, is extremely helpful in making your case before the IRS on an audit.

Charitable contributions.  For cash contributions (including checks and other monetary gifts), the donor must retain a bank record or a written acknowledgment from the charitable organization. A cash contribution of $250 or more must be substantiated with a contemporaneous written acknowledgment from the donee.  “Contemporaneous” for this purpose is defined as obtaining an acknowledgment before you file your return.  So save those letters from the charity, especially for your larger donations.

Tip records.  A taxpayer receiving tips must keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of the tip income.  Employees receiving tips must also report the correct amount to their employers.  The necessary record can be in the form of a diary, log or worksheet and should be made at or near the time the income is received.

Wagering losses.  Gamblers need to substantiate their losses. The IRS usually accepts a regularly maintained diary or similar record (such as summary records and loss schedules) as adequate substantiation, provided it is supplemented by verifiable documentation.  The diary should identify the gambling establishment and the date and type of wager, as well as amounts won and lost. Verifiable documentation can include wagering tickets, canceled checks, credit card records, and withdrawal slips from banks.

Vehicle mileage log.  A taxpayer can deduct a standard mileage rate for business, charitable or medical use of a vehicle.  If the car is also used for personal purposes, the taxpayer should keep a contemporaneous mileage log, especially for business use.  If the taxpayer wants to deduct actual expenses for business use of a car also used for personal purposes, the taxpayer has to allocate costs between the business and personal use, based on miles driven for each.

Material participation in business activity.  Taxpayers that materially participate in a business generally can deduct business losses against other income.  Otherwise, they can only deduct losses against passive income.  An individual’s participation in an activity may be established by any reasonable means.  Contemporaneous time reports, logs, or similar documents are not required but can be particularly helpful to document material participation.  To identify services performed and the hours spent on the services, records may be established using appointment books, calendars, or narrative summaries.

Hobby loss.  Taxpayers who do not engage conduct an activity with a sufficient profit motive may be considered to engage in a hobby and will not be able to deduct losses from the activity against other income.  Maintaining accurate books and records can itself be an indication of a profit motive.  Moreover, the time and activities devoted to a particular business can be essential to demonstrate that the business has a profit motive.  Contemporaneous records can be an important indicator.

Travel and entertainment.  Expenses for travel and entertainment are subject to strict substantiation requirements. Taxpayers should maintain records of the amount spent, the time and place of the activity, its business purpose, and the business relationship of the person being entertained. Contemporaneous records are particularly helpful.

The number of tax return-related identity theft incidents has almost doubled in the past three years to well over half a million reported during 2011, according to a recent report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). Identity theft in the context of tax administration generally involves the fraudulent use of someone else’s identity in order to claim a tax refund. In other cases an identity thief might steal a person’s information to obtain a job, and the thief’s employer may report income to the IRS using the legitimate taxpayer’s Social Security Number, thus making it appear that the taxpayer did not report all of his or her income.

In light of these dangers, the IRS has taken numerous steps to combat identity theft and protect taxpayers. There are also measures that you can take to safeguard yourself against identity theft in the future and assist the IRS in the process.  

IRS does not solicit financial information via email or social media

The IRS will never request a taxpayer’s personal or financial information by email or social media such as Facebook or Twitter. Likewise, the IRS will not alert taxpayers to an audit or tax refund by email or any other form of electronic communication, such as text messages and social media channels.

If you receive a scam email claiming to be from the IRS, forward it to the IRS at phishing@irs.gov. If you discover a website that claims to be the IRS but does not begin with 'www.irs.gov', forward that link to the IRS at phishing@irs.gov.

How identity thieves operate

Identity theft scams are not limited to users of email and social media tools. Scammers may also use a phone or fax to reach their victims to solicit personal information. Other means include:

-Stealing your wallet or purse
-Looking through your trash
-Accessing information you provide to an unsecured Internet site.

How do I know if I am a victim?

Your identity may have been stolen if a letter from the IRS indicates more than one tax return was filed for you or the letter states you received wages from an employer you don't know. If you receive such a letter from the IRS, leading you to believe your identity has been stolen, respond immediately to the name, address or phone number on the IRS notice. If you believe the notice is not from the IRS, contact the IRS to determine if the letter is a legitimate IRS notice.

If your tax records are not currently affected by identity theft, but you believe you may be at risk due to a lost wallet, questionable credit card activity, or credit report, you need to provide the IRS with proof of your identity. You should submit a copy of your valid government-issued identification, such as a Social Security card, driver's license or passport, along with a copy of a police report and/or a completed IRS Form 14039, Identity Theft Affidavit, which should be faxed to the IRS at 1-978-684-4542.

What should I do if someone has stolen my identity?

If you discover that someone has filed a tax return using your SSN you should contact the IRS to show the income is not yours. After the IRS authenticates who you are, your tax record will be updated to reflect only your information. The IRS will use this information to minimize future occurrences.

What other precautions can I take?

There are many things you can do to protect your identity. One is to be careful while distributing your personal information. You should show employers your Social Security card to your employer at the start of a job, but otherwise do not routinely carry your card or other documents that display your SSN.

Only use secure websites while making online financial transactions, including online shopping. Generally a secure website will have an icon, such as a lock, located in the lower right-hand corner of your web browser or the address bar of the website with read “https://…” rather than simply “http://.”

Never open suspicious attachments or links, even just to see what they say. Never respond to emails from unknown senders. Install anti-virus software, keep it updated, and run it regularly.

For taxpayers planning to e-file their tax returns, the IRS recommends use of a strong password. Afterwards, save the file to a CD or flash drive and keep it in a secure location. Then delete the personal return information from the computer hard drive.

Finally, if working with an accountant, query him or her on what measures they take to protect your information.

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), enacted in 2010, requires certain U.S. taxpayers to report their interests in specified foreign financial assets.  The reporting requirement may apply if the assets have an aggregate value exceeding certain thresholds. The IRS has released Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, for this reporting requirement under FATCA.

Reporting

For now, only specified individuals are required to file Form 8938, but specified U.S. entities will eventually also have to file the form. Taxpayers who do not file a federal income tax return for the year do not have to File Form 8938, even if the value of their foreign assets exceeds the normal reporting threshold.

Individuals who have to file Form 8938 include U.S. citizens, resident aliens for any part of the year, and nonresident aliens living in Puerto Rico or American Samoa.

Reporting applies to specified foreign financial assets. Specified foreign financial assets include:

• A financial account maintained by a foreign financial institution;
• Other foreign financial assets, such as stock or securities issued by a non-U.S. person, or an interest in a foreign entity.

The aggregate value of the individual’s specified foreign financial assets must exceed specified reporting thresholds, as follows:

• Unmarried U.S. taxpayers, and married U.S. taxpayers filing a separate return – more than $50,000 on the last day of the year, or more than $75,000 at any time during the year;
• U.S. married taxpayers filing a joint return – more than $100,000 on the last day of the year, or more than $150,000 at any time during the year; or
• Taxpayers living abroad: if filing a joint return, more than $400,000 on the last day of the year, or more than $600,000 during the year; other taxpayers, more than $200,000 on the last day of the year, or more than $300,000 at any time during the year.

Taxpayers who report assets on other forms, such as Form 3520, do not have to report the asset on Form 8938, but must use Form 8938 to identify other forms on which they report.

Filing

Reporting applies for tax years beginning after March 18, 2010, the date that FATCA was enacted. Most taxpayers, such as those who report their taxes for the calendar year, must start filing Form 8938 with their 2011 income tax return.

If you have any questions about Form 8938, please contact our office.